News

While citywide public Wi-Fi has supporters on the new Santa Cruz City Council, the city's Peter Koht says it's a thorny issue.

While citywide public Wi-Fi has supporters on the new Santa Cruz City Council, the city's Peter Koht says it's a thorny issue.

The thinking goes like this: surely, there must be some way to turn Santa Cruz into Silicon Beach, a free-surfing utopia where budding entrepreneurs ride waves of innovation like Nat Young at Steamers Lane.

One idea is free wireless Internet, and it was a popular one this year on the Santa Cruz City Council campaign trail.

In September, six out of the eight candidates expressed their support for free Wi-Fi. Only Mayor Don Lane and Pamela Comstock dissented against the idea at the Inside Scoop forum at Kuumbwa Jazz Center.

There are a few barriers to city-sponsored Wi-Fi, though, according to tech experts, starting with the speed of innovation.

“Technology moves very, very quickly, and government moves at the speed of government,” says Peter Koht, the city’s economic development coordinator.  He notes there are also privacy and safety concerns that come into play.

Public Wi-Fi hotspots have already flopped in cities like San Francisco, Mountain View, Pasadena Houston, St. Louis and Philadelphia. It’s up and running in Milpitas, but that’s by no means the norm.

Chris Stathis, the city’s chief tech officer, says the project would require a massive broadband, something the city has already committed to. But that will take time. Stathis adds people will want constant tech support, well outside the hours the city can offer. “People want their Wi-Fi at 10 o’clock at night, and they want it on the weekends,” he says.

Outgoing councilmember Ryan Coonerty has expressed concerns that free Wi-FI would turn stores “into showrooms for Internet companies,” and says he hasn’t heard many people asking for Wi-Fi anyway.

“I just think we have to be careful that we don’t put our businesses into a situation where they are paying sales tax and employing people and then—using a city infrastructure—we’re allowing people to buy from out state companies that don’t pay sales tax,” Coonerty said in a public meeting last year. 

  • http://www.santacruz.com/news/2012/11/07/citywide_public_wi_fi_for_santa_cruz_unlikely Yoysa

    Amazing that someone like Coonerty is so tech ignorant, has this man been living under a rock?  I can scan a product barcode with my smartphone at any store in Santa Cruz, get internet pricing and purchase it on the spot if I wish.  And, I don’t need WiFi to do that, it’s called a cellular data network.  In addition, citywide Wifi would just be a waste of money (Also if you haven’t noticed, Amazon and other major internet retailers now have to charge CA sales tax).  It’s already flopped in the valley so why even pursue when the city is already strapped for cash.  There’s dozens of places all around the city that already offer free WiFi. Also, it’s really funny there was this huge outcry about the Smart Meter WiFi RF radiation making people sick (which I think is a bunch of nonsense) but the city is considering deploying the same type of equipment city wide….

  • http://www.santacruz.com/news/2012/11/07/citywide_public_wi_fi_for_santa_cruz_unlikely Jacob Pierce

    Thanks for your comments, Yoysa.

    Just to clarify and be fair to Connerty, his comments were in a different context from an unrelated meeting last year, before the state started collecting sales tax… which don’t go to the city. Thanks for reading!