News

Locals on “Weconomics,” “House Warming,” and Desal.

Share Where

Re: “Weconomics” (Cover, Sept. 18): I read the article “Weconomics” with great interest—I am a big fan of community based gifting and sharing.  After reading it, I went to the websites in the article and to my great chagrin, most were of no use whatsoever.  Yerdle is in beta and a mobile only app (and a very complicated model), Neighborgoods has been abandoned, Tripping is in beta, Getaround would not recognize 95010 (Capitola) as part of California, etc. Beyond this, the article failed to mention one of the most used and robust on-line gifting sights, Freecycle.org. So much for fact checking.  

Cara Finn

Capitola

Cat Johnson responds: The point of the article was to highlight new, tech-enabled sharing platforms. Freecycle is one of the most-used sites, that’s why I chose to spotlight others. Neighborgoods is still going. When I put Capitola into Getaround’s search, two cars came up, with numerous others in the surrounding towns. As I point out in the article, the more people get involved with the sharing economy, the stronger and more widespread it becomes. Don’t give up on these sites yet. They’re the frontrunners in an exciting movement.

 

Life as a House

Re: “House Warming” (Cover, Aug. 14): Our designer Graham Irwin’s amazing dedication and talent in the science and life-cycle impacts of buildings was our stalwart guide throughout this entire project. With his direction, a nearly century old structure was recreated into an incredibly efficient, climate-responsive building. When future PV is added to the roof that electricity can be used for electric vehicles instead of serving a leaky, inefficient building. The synergy of our designer Graham working together with our builder Taylor allowed us to do all this for a very modest additional cost! That’s the real-world benefit of successful and effective teamwork, what Anne Edminister calls “Integrated Design.” Pat Splitt, Duane Wilson and Terry Norbye also each made invaluable contributions in solar thermal design, solar thermal installation and air-sealing respectively. Yes, it can be done!

Kurt Hurley

Santa Cruz

 

Wet Mess

After attending the recent Desal Alternative meeting at the Circle Church last Thursday, it became very clear what the real problem of our “water crisis” is.

According to former employees of our Water Department and other experts, we have many abundant and sustainable sources of water. The first half of the “problem” is an antiquated, backward and disorganized mess of conflicting water resource rights and misplaced reference maps that could be resolved by some constructive meetings of the principle municipal, state and federal water rights stake holders. The other half of the “problem” is those in positions of power making really bad choices like funding millions of our tax dollars to write badly flawed, prejudicial “studies” promoting the construction of a Desalination Plant instead of building a pipeline that would carry recycled waste water from the waste treatment plant to golf courses, public parks and recreation areas. Now that we understand what the real problem is, maybe we can work together as a community to clean up this mess and have a sustainable resource for ourselves and future generations.

Drew Lewis

Santa Cruz

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/letters_to_the_editor_sep.25_oct.2.html Steve Newman

      Desal is ok for saudi arabia that has unlimited fuel and money for desal plants, and has no rainfall.
    Desal doesn’t work for Santa Cruz which doesn’t have the money, doesn’t want to create greenhouse
    gas burning all that fuel, AND has plenty of rainfall in the winters.

        Santa Cruz needs reserves to handle the occasional long term drought.  Soquel needs to save its underground water
    source (aquifer) that is dying due to over-pumping. Together, (neither can do it alone), the Soquel water district and
    city of Santa Cruz could solve our water problems without a desal plant by implementing the regional water sharing
    plan called the Lochquifer Plan.

      The basic idea is:  Every summer, the city would send about half the water in our Loch
    Lomond reservoir to Soquel for its use. That’s about twice as much water as a desal plant would provide. That amount
    of water then would not be pumped by Soquel wells. The aquifer would be fully restored, naturally, in about seven years
    rather than the 20 years required using desal. As the aquifers rapidly refill, they become a massive “storage tank” for
    Santa Cruz drought relief. During the occasional multi-year drought, Santa Cruz would get the water it needs from the
    aquifer. After the drought ends, the replenishing of the aquifers would resume. Problem solved without desal.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/09/24/letters_to_the_editor_sep.25_oct.2 Steve Newman

      Desal is ok for saudi arabia that has unlimited fuel and money for desal plants, and has no rainfall.
    Desal doesn’t work for Santa Cruz which doesn’t have the money, doesn’t want to create greenhouse
    gas burning all that fuel, AND has plenty of rainfall in the winters.

        Santa Cruz needs reserves to handle the occasional long term drought.  Soquel needs to save its underground water
    source (aquifer) that is dying due to over-pumping. Together, (neither can do it alone), the Soquel water district and
    city of Santa Cruz could solve our water problems without a desal plant by implementing the regional water sharing
    plan called the Lochquifer Plan.

      The basic idea is:  Every summer, the city would send about half the water in our Loch
    Lomond reservoir to Soquel for its use. That’s about twice as much water as a desal plant would provide. That amount
    of water then would not be pumped by Soquel wells. The aquifer would be fully restored, naturally, in about seven years
    rather than the 20 years required using desal. As the aquifers rapidly refill, they become a massive “storage tank” for
    Santa Cruz drought relief. During the occasional multi-year drought, Santa Cruz would get the water it needs from the
    aquifer. After the drought ends, the replenishing of the aquifers would resume. Problem solved without desal.

  • http://staragara.net/ garywal

    Every summer, the city would send about half the water in our Loch
    Lomond reservoir to Soquel for its use. That’s about twice as much water as a desal plant would provide.

  • http://staragara.net/ garywal

    Every summer, the city would send about half the water in our Loch
    Lomond reservoir to Soquel for its use. That’s about twice as much water as a desal plant would provide.