News

Readers weigh in on water supply problems, staying weird and dogs.

No Alternative

Re: “Wrong Approach” (Letters, March 20): Let’s get real about solutions to the City of Santa Cruz (City) and Soquel Creek Water District’s (SqCWD) water supply problems. Misinformation being published alleges SqCWD has a viable alternative to the proposed desalination project. That so-called alternative is in fact mandatory reduction of at least 35% year-round for 20 years. This draconian concept would have severe adverse impacts on the quality of life and local economy. The point SqCWD made by adopting the policy to pursue 35% mandatory rationing in the absence of the proposed desalination project is that there is no “Plan B” that solves the groundwater crisis.

The city has been criticized for not having a “Plan B.” The truth is that they share the same dilemma. There are no other viable options–individually or in combination–that solve the water shortage. Added to drought shortages are new fisheries regulations that will significantly restrict the city’s use of streams it depends on.

Bottom line: Both the city and SqCWD conducted thorough and responsible due diligence on the water issue. Desalination is the only environmentally, socially and economically responsible solution.

If you support a realistic approach to solving our water needs, please join the Sustainable Water Coalition www.sustainablewatersantacruz.org

Dan Kriege
Former Director, Soquel Creek Water District

Mike McClellan
Former Member, City of Santa Cruz Water Commission

 

Safely Weird?

Re: “Postcards From the Edge” (Currents, March 26): Speaking as a born and raised—and young for that matter—local, I can’t overstate how proud I am to see our community honoring recently fallen citizens. The overriding message on marquees, storefronts and impromptu memorials is indicative of a strong, resilient community turning grievance into tangible changes.

I will say I’ve perceived an undercurrent of apprehension at the mention of “overhauling” our approach to crime and “shifting” the paradigm. People seem to confuse this with changing Santa Cruz’s culture en total. Let’s put some dissonance to rest: Santa Cruz is unique because its cultural reach is disproportionate to its size. We are welcoming, accepting, artistic, athletic, educational and altogether unmatched in manifold ways. A little eclecticism is a welcome part of the package. The tinge of funkiness is something I hold dear. Violence, vagrancy and drug abuse, however, has not and should never define Santa Cruz. Our tolerance is not indiscriminate.

Let’s stay weird-peacefully.  

B.J. Cope
Santa Cruz

Be the Dog

Let me steal for the Tom Petty song for a moment, and ask people to “stop draggin' your dog around.” Stop dragging your dog behind bicycles, skateboards, roller blades, and your own fleet feet.

Asphalt is unforgiving; if that's the way you get your cardio workout in, wonderful. But don't try to kill two birds with one stone by subjecting your companion to a joyless romp through a harsh landscape. A dog's nature, lest we forget, is to engage with and relish the million bits of information he encounters in his environment–and to do so on doggy time, not on human beat-the-clock time.

Remember the old Zen koan: Does a dog have Buddha nature? Heck, dogs are the damn Buddha incarnate! They're awake! And they like to get their playtime in natural settings conducive to contemplation. For all we know, maybe sniffing another dog's butt and rolling in the grass are paths to enlightenment.

So unless your dog actually enjoys getting tethered and towed around like a water skier on pavement–and I don't dispute that those dogs are out there–take him to the park or the beach. Then just sit back and “be the dog.” It's really quiet instructive.

Tim Rudolph
Santa Cruz

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/02/letters_to_the_editor_april_3_9 Bill Smallman

    Yes Alternative.

    Mr. Kriege and Mr. McClellan are mistaken, as well as all the “expert” studies which they allowed roadblocks to not see an alternative plan.  First, they discarded the idea of using reclaimed water.  The “experts” said that the cost of a distribution system was “prohibitively expensive”, when pipelines to distribute the water may cost somewhat more, (not “prohibitive”, than the 125 million Desal, and the water can be produced at 1/5 the cost and sold instead of polluting the bay. Over time, financially, it is better that Desal.  They also believe reclaimed water needs tertiary treatment, when, in fact, it does not:
    12. Engineering Science. Monterey Wastewater Reclamation Study for Agriculture.
    Report to the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency. Berkeley, CA.
    1987.  Soquel uses the same aquifer as Ag does, and Ag demand could be reduced by at least 30% if reclaimed water was used.  In addition, the also rejected building water storage reservoirs, because of environmentalists, when environmentalist might just make some compromises when they compare issues vs. the environmentally way worse Desal.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/letters_to_the_editor_april_3_9.html Bill Smallman

    Yes Alternative.

    Mr. Kriege and Mr. McClellan are mistaken, as well as all the “expert” studies which they allowed roadblocks to not see an alternative plan.  First, they discarded the idea of using reclaimed water.  The “experts” said that the cost of a distribution system was “prohibitively expensive”, when pipelines to distribute the water may cost somewhat more, (not “prohibitive”, than the 125 million Desal, and the water can be produced at 1/5 the cost and sold instead of polluting the bay. Over time, financially, it is better that Desal.  They also believe reclaimed water needs tertiary treatment, when, in fact, it does not:
    12. Engineering Science. Monterey Wastewater Reclamation Study for Agriculture.
    Report to the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency. Berkeley, CA.
    1987.  Soquel uses the same aquifer as Ag does, and Ag demand could be reduced by at least 30% if reclaimed water was used.  In addition, the also rejected building water storage reservoirs, because of environmentalists, when environmentalist might just make some compromises when they compare issues vs. the environmentally way worse Desal.